Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy
The federal government requires that institutions approved to offer Title IV aid monitor each student's academic progress. This is done to ensure that students receiving financial aid are making what is called Satisfactory Academic Progress. To remain eligible for federal financial aid, students must meet all of Meridian’s Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) standards established for their specific enrollment status. These standards are separate from the academic standing policies set by the institution.
For Students Enrolled in Coursework
For Coursework Students, evaluation of SAP occurs on a quarterly basis, once grades have been posted for the quarter just ended.
Satisfactory Academic Progress for coursework students has three standards - quantitative, qualitative and overall maximum timeframe.
As Meridian University does not use the traditional grade point average (GPA) as a method of evaluation, the ratio of successfully completed credits to total attempted credits is examined for both qualitative and quantitative purposes, on a cumulative basis.
To remain eligible for financial aid, a minimum 67% of attempted units must be successfully completed. Transfer credit (“TU”) will be considered as both attempted and completed units. Incomplete grades (“INC”), no credit grades (“NC”), withdrawn grades (“W”), and multi-quarter courses in progress with grades pending (“MQC”) will be counted as attempted units and excluded from completed units until successful grades are posted to the transcript. This 67% benchmark serves as both a qualitative assessment of academic standing relative to institutional expectations as well as a quantitative assessment of progress towards completion.
The percentage of completed credits is calculated by dividing the number of successfully completed credits by the number of attempted credits, rounded up to the nearest integer. For example, if the student attempts 8 credits in the spring quarter but only successfully completes a total of 5 credits, the student has completed only 63% of attempted units and so is not maintaining SAP. Students who do not make satisfactory academic progress are placed on financial aid warning.
Example: The Quantitative and Qualitative Standards in Practice
|Courses and Grades||SAP Implications|
|First Year - Fall Quarter||Sarah takes four courses, each worth 3 quarter credits. Therefore she is attempting a total of 12 quarter credits. She passes three courses, but does not submit her final paper for the fourth course and therefore receives an “Incomplete” grade.||Sarah has completed 9 of the 12 quarter credits she attempted. Therefore she has completed 75% of attempted credits and is successfully “making SAP.”|
|First Year - Winter Quarter||Sarah takes three courses, each worth 3 quarter credits. Therefore she is attempting a total of 9 quarter credits. She passes one course, but gets a “No Credit” for the second course because she did not meet the attendance requirement. She gets an “Incomplete” for the third course because she did not submit the final paper.||Sarah has now attempted a total of 21 quarter credits and completed 12. Therefore she has completed 58% of attempted credits and is not making SAP. She is placed on Financial Aid Warning Status (she has until the end of the spring quarter to resolve this.)|
|First Year - Spring Quarter||Sarah attempts two courses, each worth 3 quarter credits. She passes both. During the spring quarter, she also goes through the late paper submission process for the winter quarter course in which she received an “incomplete.” Her grade for that course is changed to a “pass.”||Sarah has now attempted a total of 27 quarter credits and completed 21 quarter credits. Therefore she has completed 78% of attempted credits and is successfully making SAP again. She is no longer on Financial Aid Warning Status.|
|First Year - Summer Quarter||Sarah attempts two courses, each worth 3 quarter credits. She passes both.||Sarah has now attempted a total of 33 quarter credits and completed 27. Therefore she has completed 82% of attempted credits and is successfully “making SAP.”|
Financial Aid Warning Status
The first time a student does not meet SAP standards they are placed on Financial Aid Warning for one quarter by the Financial Aid Office. This means the student is one quarter away from losing their financial aid eligibility. During this time, financial aid funds are released. However, students who fail to make satisfactory progress after the financial aid warning period lose their aid eligibility. Students who fail to successfully complete a minimum of 67% of attempted units each year will lose eligibility for Federal Direct Unsubsidized and Grad Plus Loans. These students will be notified in writing if/when their eligibility for federal aid is suspended.
Appealing Financial Aid SAP Status
A student who is no longer eligible for federal financial aid due to failure to meet Meridian’s SAP standards may appeal to have their financial aid reinstated for one quarter if extenuating circumstances have hindered academic performance. Appeals must be in writing and describe the basis for the appeal: the death of a relative, an injury or illness of the student, or other special circumstance. The appeal should include an explanation as to what has now changed that would allow the student to demonstrate SAP by the next quarterly evaluation and a Learning Agreement that provides a detailed explanation of how and when deficiencies will be resolved and may include a proposed timeline for completion of the degree requirements. The outcome of this appeal will depend on the nature of the circumstances, the quality of the documentation provided, and how well the student has demonstrated the ability to progress towards degree completion within a reasonable time period.
The appeal and the Learning Agreement are submitted to:Financial Aid Office
47 Sixth Street,
Petaluma, CA 94952
P: (707) 765-1836
These materials are to be submitted within two weeks of being notified of losing financial aid eligibility. The Student Development Committee will review each student’s appeal and proposed Learning Agreement to determine whether the SAP standards will be met and if eligibility for federal aid may be reinstated.
The following are examples of extenuating circumstances that can be considered for appeal, along with examples of documentation.
|Circumstance||Examples of Appropriate Supporting Documentation|
|The death of a family member, relative, or significant person in the student’s life||Copy of an obituary or death certificate|
|Significant injury or illness of the student||Physician's statement, police report, or hospital billing statement, and personal statement of the illness|
|A significant injury or illness of a family member, relative, or other such close person in the student’s life||Physician's statement, police report, or hospital billing statement, and personal statement of the illness from the individual for whom the student provided care or support.|
|Family difficulties such as divorce or separation of the student or student’s parents||Court documentation or letter from the attorney in the case|
|Significant interpersonal problems with friends, roommates, or significant other.||Written statement from an attorney, professional advisor, or other individual describing circumstances and personal statement to this effect.|
The Student Development Committee reviews appeals on a case-by-case basis to determine if the student qualifies for an extension. Reviews are completed within 15 working days from receiving all complete documentation from the student.
If this appeal is approved, the student will be eligible to receive financial aid for one quarter and will be placed on financial aid probation. Students will be notified via email of the outcome of their appeal.
If a student has been placed on academic probation by the Student Development Committee, the student must develop a learning agreement that has been approved by the committee in order to return to ‘clear’ academic status as soon as possible. During this academic probation period, a student may remain eligible to receive financial aid.
Students who fail to meet the requirements of their learning agreement are required to meet with the Student Development Committee. The committee may extend the student’s academic probation (as opposed to administrative withdrawal) but during this academic probation period the student is not eligible to receive further financial aid.
For PhD Students Enrolled in the Dissertation Period
All eligible financial aid recipients entering the dissertation phase of the PhD program will be awarded financial aid on a borrower-based academic year. This means that from the time the eight-quarter PhD dissertation period begins, financial aid will cover four consecutive quarters, twice.
Students who are completing their dissertation during the eight quarter PhD dissertation period demonstrate SAP by submitting acceptable written work to their dissertation committee chair and advisor, as follows:
- Upon completion of the first four quarters of the eight-quarter PhD dissertation enrollment period, the financial aid office will confirm your active participation in the dissertation process. Active participation is defined as the submission of written materials beyond the dissertation proposal as well as ongoing consultation with your dissertation committee. The committee chair must confirm that such progress has occurred via the chair’s submission of the Active Participation form.
- Once active participation is confirmed, the student may be eligible for additional financial aid during the second year of the two-year clock.
At the end of the eight quarters of the PhD dissertation enrollment period, in order to be making SAP, a student must at minimum have submitted the dissertation’s Chapter Four in order to receive aid during a third year of PhD dissertation work.
Students who find that additional time beyond the eight quarters is necessary for completion of the PhD dissertation must enroll in the extended four-quarter clock. In order to make SAP to remain eligible to receive aid during a third year of PhD dissertation work, the student must at minimum have submitted an acceptable draft of the dissertation’s fourth chapter (the Learnings Chapter). The committee chair must confirm that such progress has occurred via the chair’s submission of the Learnings Chapter Submission form to the financial aid office.
Requirements for the dissertation’s fourth chapter are defined by each program and are included in the program’s Dissertation Handbook. It is the student’s responsibility to stay in contact with their committee and to follow-up on the progress of their chapter four approval.
Financial aid is not available beyond the third year of PhD dissertation work.
PhD dissertation students completing the dissertation are considered to be in progress and will be counted as attempted credits; students will not receive completed credits until the student completes their dissertation.
For PsyD Students Enrolled in the Clinical Case Study (CCS) Period
All eligible financial aid recipients entering the clinical case study phase of the PsyD program will be awarded financial aid on a borrower-based academic year. This means that from the time the four-quarter PsyD clinical case study period begins, financial aid will cover four consecutive quarters.
Students who are completing their clinical case study during the four quarter PsyD clinical case study period demonstrate SAP by submitting acceptable written work to their CCS advisor, as follows:
- Upon completion of the first two quarters of the four-quarter PsyD clinical case study enrollment period, the financial aid office will confirm your active participation in the clinical case study process. Active participation is defined as the submission of written materials beyond the first two clinical case study chapters, as well as ongoing consultation with your advisor. Your advisor must confirm that such progress has occurred via their submission of the Active Participation form.
PsyD students completing the clinical case study are considered to be in progress and will be counted as attempted credits; students will not receive completed credits until the student completes their clinical case study.
The length of time that the student can remain eligible for federal student aid is measured in terms of credits attempted. Students may not attempt more than 150% of a program’s length (e.g., for a 60 credit program, the student may not attempt more than 90 credits).
The following chart lists the maximum number of credits a student may attempt in the process of completing their degree:
|DEGREE PROGRAM||Total Credits Required||Maximum Number of Attempted Credits Allowed|
|Ph.D. Psychology |
|Psy.D. Clinical Psychology||166||249|
|Psy.D. Clinical Psychology |
|M.A. Counseling Psychology||105||157.5|
|Ed.D. Organizational Development||115||135|
|M.Ed. Educational Leadership||60||90|
|MBA Creative Enterprise||60||90|