Directive leadership is a style of leadership. It involves a leader taking a highly structured approach to tasks, closely directing and monitoring the activities of their subordinates to deliver pre-determined results. The leader provides clear expectations, guidelines, and rules for how work should be done. This style emphasizes hierarchy, control, and prioritizing task performance over interpersonal relationships.

A woman dressed in business attire assigns tasks to her team members at a table

What is directive coaching leadership style?

This type of leadership is often called “command and control.” The leader holds total authority and decision-making power. Team members are expected to follow established procedures and the chain of command. It is one of the most rigid styles of leadership.

Directive leadership was born from path-goal theory initially presented by pProfessor of business management Martin G. Evans in 1970. The path-goal theory was then evolved and revised by Professor Robert House in 1971 and 1996.

Key characteristics of directive leadership

Some of the critical characteristics of directive leadership include:

• Established hierarchy: There are clear authority tiers from leaders to team members.
• Rules and regulations: The leader sets rules, regulations, standards, and policies that team members must follow.
• Leaders provide structure: Leaders plan the work and establish set procedures for accomplishing tasks.
• Task-oriented: The primary focus is on accomplishing tasks efficiently. Interpersonal relations are secondary.
• Path-goal theory: Leaders define the goals, clarify the path, remove obstacles, and provide support to ensure goals are met.

What are the pros and cons of directive leadership?

Directive leadership offers both benefits and drawbacks. On the positive side, this leadership style can be effective for:

• Inexperienced team members who need structure and guidance. The leader’s close supervision helps them learn their role.
• Routine and repetitive tasks that require following set procedures. Workers appreciate the clarity of expectations.
• Crises or times of change that require taking decisive action. The leader can issue orders to stabilize the situation.
• Ensuring compliance with rules and regulations in operations like manufacturing or healthcare.

There are, however, some downsides to directive leadership that include:

• Team members have no autonomy or input into decision-making, which can lower morale and engagement.
• Over-monitoring team members can negatively impact productivity and innovation. Workers may also fear mistakes.
• Team members are given few opportunities to develop skills or leadership capabilities.
• The leader can become a bottleneck for operations as all decisions flow through them.

What situation would require directive leadership?

Military forces are a classic example of how directive leadership works. There is a top-down command and control structure, and leaders and subordinates at all levels must follow commands generated from the top. For example, gGeneral officers may need to move forces to support other units in need. With directive leadership, gGeneral officers can be confident that their forces will move and act as required when given orders.

Finding balance

Directive leadership has its use cases but should be balanced with other approaches. Most experts note that the best leaders tailor and blend their leadership style to the situation.

For instance, leaders may take a directive approach with inexperienced team members. But they may use a more collaborative style with seasoned veterans. Or they may set clear guidelines for routine tasks but give team members autonomy for creative projects.

The most effective leaders transition from highly directive to more empowering leadership as their team gains competency. In doing so, they create agile, adaptable, motivated teams.

Conclusion

Directive leadership provides structure, control, and focus on the execution of tasks. It works best in particular situations with inexperienced teams. However, it should be balanced with other styles to create a well-rounded and empowering working environment. The best leaders adapt to meet the needs of their team and the circumstances.

Leaders are created, not born. How you lead is typically an amalgamation of learned behaviors from other leaders you follow throughout your life. Understanding leadership theory and underlying psychological traits such as empathy can be gained in programs like Meridian University’s MBA in Creative Enterprise. If you want to learn the latest leadership and management techniques, this program pulls together whole-person and whole-system competencies, so graduates emerge as true strategic leaders.

To learn more, speak with an Admissions Advisor or apply online today!

References:

1. House, R. J. (1971). A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
2. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
3. Shonk, K. (2023, July 27). Directive Leadership: When It Does—And Doesn’t—Work. Harvard Law School Daily Blog. Retrieved September 23, 2023, from https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/leadership-skills-daily/directive-leadership-when-it-does-and-doesnt-work/